Otherwise it's a question of experimenting with whatever you've got. Whether they'd be appropriate for your subjects I obviously couldn't say. Although neither is as feature packed as Sony Vegas, Hitfilm is an affordable and well-kept piece of software while Resolve comes for free and has a world-class grading suite build in. The program, which Magix bought from Sony in 2016, costs 600 (£500) to buy outright, but the subscription model gets you access from just 16.67 (£12.42) per month under the moniker VEGAS Pro 365. If you are a Sony Vegas Pro user and don’t see any future for your beloved NLE, maybe you should give DaVinci Resolve or Hitfilm a try. Though most distinguished at small point sizes (as they were designed to be), fonts like Verdana and Georgia are certainly highly legible. In an attempt to attract new videographers and video editors, Magix is making its VEGAS Pro video editing software available on a subscription basis. If you have to stick with what is effectively free, Tor is right to refer you to some of Microsoft's 'Core Fonts for the Web' (Adobe and FontFont also have fonts optimised for use on screen though they're not free). I would also highly recommend Adobe's Multiple Master fonts or their more recent OpenType opticals: by misusing optical sizes - using a face designed for small point sizes at a much larger size - several fonts that would otherwise be non-starters are perfectly useable. Contrary to some advice, one can use serif faces as long as they're nearer to the 'slab serif' rather than 'unbracketed serif' end of the scale. That means 'modern', very highly-contrasted faces (Bodoni or Didot for example) are usually out, as are most calligraphic scripts. The former is partly the application of a similar combination of skills (I have to say that 'stick with Arial' seems a very long way wide of the mark to me) but there are of course a few more-or-less immutable rules, particularly if one is working in a low resolution context.Ībove all, because there is simply no room for any detail, there's no point choosing a typeface where great detail is absolutely integral to the design. Getting the latter right is (like most design skills) a combination of knowledge, talent and experience the only shortcut to finding the right font is asking a designer for help. not just regular and bold), and optical variants (fonts designed for use at particular sizes).Įssentially there are two imperatives when choosing a typeface: legibility and stylistic appositeness. What's missing? Primarily, small caps (all small caps can often be far more legible than all uppercase in video), old style figures (more of a stylistic matter), a range of weights (i.e. Beginners are happy to use whatever they happen to find dumped on their computers with the operating system or application software but these wouldn't begin to satisfy anyone serious about type. You would usually be much better off finding a typography forum and asking about typefaces for use at very low resolution.Ģ. For some reason all kinds of people who know next to nothing about typography and design will feel free to contribute, even though they wouldn't dream of doing so on any other subject. Ignore the advice about typefaces given in a forum such as this unless you're pretty sure it's coming from a design specialist. how much trouble you're prepared to go to) but here are a couple of general rules:ġ. But i've yet to see any setup that runs 4k neat at 25p+ with zero glitches, even in our post houees witj serious machinery.One doesn't know how much this matters to you (i.e. The only serious hit I encounter is running Neat video, in 4K, this little plug in add on eats up playback rate from 24p to 5-6p max. Nothing fancy, my average laptop and workstation work great (i7, nvidia, HDDs, 16/24ram) But It's actually faster when you work with 4K in a native 4k timeline vs an HD timeline, perhaps scaling bogs it down a bit. So yes am using Vegas Pro for 4K video and it's a breeze, both in 4K and HD timelines. Red epic files (import natively) and heavily compressed GH4 H.264 4K. I currently use 1DC 4K MJPEG files (very heavy) and it does stutter a bit on playback but I set the preview resolution to ''Best, Quarter (1080p)'' and it works realtime. I LOVE vegas pro 13 and can't imagine why there doesn't seem to be more users.Īs for 4k, I edit 4K and colour abd render easily, nothing stops you. It's one of the very few NLEs where you can edit, colour, and do audio on the highest level there is, no need to get out for anything (except for resolve to get auto subject tracking in maks, that's the only missing piece and the reason resolve is installed here). The visual tactile representation of cutting and editting footage on the timeline is a generation ahead of ALL NLEs. I rate Sony's Vegas at the highest end NLEs ever made for video production. I have latest premiere installed along with my VEGAS PRO 13, and both have virtually the same speed, playback and renderring.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |